Trump moves to remove Syria from US list of state sponsors of terrorism
US President Donald Trump formally began the process of removing Syria from the US list of state sponsors of terrorism on Wednesday, notifying Congress after telling Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa t
US President Donald Trump formally began the process of removing Syria from the US list of state sponsors of terrorism on Wednesday, notifying Congres
Read Full Story at France 24 →Why This Matters
The potential delisting of Syria from the U.S. State Sponsors of Terrorism list marks a seismic shift in Middle East diplomacy, signaling a possible thaw in relations after years of mutual hostility. Beyond the symbolic gesture, it could unlock billions in frozen assets and foreign aid, reshaping Syria’s economic recovery prospects while testing the Biden administration’s willingness to reengage with Damascus despite lingering sanctions.
Background Context
The designation dates back to 1979, when Syria was first labeled a state sponsor of terrorism for its support of Hezbollah, Hamas, and its role in Lebanon’s civil war. Decades of sanctions followed, including the 2011 Caesar Act, which compounded Syria’s economic collapse after the civil war. Trump’s move, however, suggests a pragmatic shift—one that contrasts sharply with the Obama administration’s hardline stance, despite Syria’s continued ties to Iran and Russia.
What Happens Next
Congress has 45 days to review the delisting, a process likely to face bipartisan resistance given Syria’s unresolved war crimes allegations and ongoing Iranian influence. If approved, Syria could seek international reconstruction funding, but major hurdles remain, including U.S. sanctions and the Assad regime’s refusal to engage in meaningful political reforms. The move also risks alienating regional allies like Israel and Gulf states who view Syria as an Iranian proxy.
Bigger Picture
This reflects a broader pattern of Trump’s post-presidency influence, where his administration’s foreign policy instincts—often clashing with institutional resistance—continue to shape U.S. actions years later. It also underscores the fluidity of U.S. strategy in the Middle East, where counterterrorism designations are increasingly used as bargaining chips rather than immutable policy anchors.
